Is Astrology considered a valid field?

Think of it as a clock divided into 12 parts

In my opinion, Astrology is located on the border between  science and art, as it often sparks debates due to its complex nature and historical controversies.

1. Has it principles and theorems?

It cannot be considered science as time as it does not have proven principles and theorems to substantiate its approach. 

The art is not complete while its beauty is confirmed by only two people: the astrologer and the person in question, other public being excluded as irrelevant.

2. Is it accurate?

The accuracy of an astrological forecast is in the eye of the reader. When an astrologer reads your chart and you find this reading enlightening and relevant, then I can say that astrological study has proven to be valid and correct for you. The opinion of a third party cannot be taken into account because it has nothing to do with the situation .

3. Is Astrology considered a valid field?

It is difficult to find arguments in favor of this answer. History tells us that disputes still last in ancient Rome. Astrologers were often banished because they spread a barbaric superstition. But they always returned when the population needed their services. While some view it as an insightful tool for personal growth, others question its validity in modern times.

Many things have not been proven to be well founded, and yet people ask for them because they need them. 

If you agree or don't with opinion Star knowledge is located on the border between science and art, please leave a comment here.